The receipts

Numbers, not adjectives.

Most firms show you testimonials. We'd rather show you receipts: documented outcomes from employee-owned rollouts and the programs in John's plan — the industry, the headcount, the situation, and what actually happened. No names, and there's a good reason for that too.

$4–5Msaved yearly by one rural hospital
$2.25Msaved yearly by another — 60 plans, 6 carriers
−42%average plan cost at an 800-person company
21 daysto onboard the first 300 of 1,850 employees
Why you don't see logos here

Two reasons, both deliberate. First, these outcomes were documented across the enrollment platforms and programs Revival Health installs — some are John's engagements, others are documented rollouts on the same machinery his plan uses. Presenting them with names would claim credit that isn't the point; the arithmetic is the point. Second, those platforms stay white-labeled until you're a client — naming names invites middlemen to mark up the same tools and gives away your edge. So every case shows industry, size, and numbers — never names — and every figure is illustrative until it's yours, documented in writing before you commit a dollar.

Question one

Does the math actually hold?

The savings claim is the part everyone doubts. Here's what the model produced at companies that ran it — different industries, different sizes, same arithmetic.

Senior living
$350K+
saved every year — after two straight 25% renewals

Two consecutive 25% renewals. Moved to employee-owned coverage and cut spend 19% — $350K+ a year, roughly 35% below where the increases were headed. Choice did the heavy lifting: 950 eligible employees picked 56 different plans, and the first 300 were onboarded in 21 days.

Senior-living operator · Florida · 1,850 employees
Rural healthcare
$4–5M
annual savings off a volatile self-funded plan

A volatile self-funded plan swinging millions year to year. Replaced the volatility with fixed, budgeted contributions — roughly $4–5M a year in savings, and a number the board can finally plan around.

Rural hospital · Idaho · 400+ employees
Rural healthcare
$2.25M
saved annually — employees chose from 60 plans across 6 carriers

Group renewals that had become unsustainable. Saved $2.25M a year — and employees came out with more, not less: 60 plans to choose from across six carriers, instead of a take-it-or-leave-it group option.

Rural hospital · Indiana · ~400 employees
Technology
$1M → 401(k)
annual savings reinvested as a 25% richer retirement match

Facing a 20% claims-driven increase. Went employee-owned instead of absorbing it, saved $1M a year — and reinvested the savings as a 25% boost to 401(k) contributions. A renewal increase became a retirement benefit.

Multinational technology company · Offices worldwide
Healthcare services
$2,000
saved per enrolled employee — across 48 states

Saved about $2,000 per enrolled employee, escaped a high-risk pool, and saw participation climb among younger employees — with one program spanning 48 states, which no single group plan handles gracefully.

Healthcare-services company · Employees in 48 states
Professional services
40%
the renewal increase they never paid

Hit with a 40% renewal increase. Instead of paying it, moved to employee-owned coverage — trading the annual repricing for a fixed, predictable spend, with coverage localized to where each employee actually lives.

Professional-services firm · Sales-performance training
Question two

What happens to employees?

The fear is that savings come out of employees' hides. The documented pattern is the opposite: more choice, higher participation, and money left over.

Contact centers
−42%
average monthly plan cost — $971 down to $562, participation up 60%

Average monthly plan cost fell 42% — from $971 to $562 — while participation rose 60%. Cheaper for the company and more people opted in: those two lines almost never move that way together.

Contact-center operator · 800+ employees
Consumer services
Ownership
plans moved into employees' hands — savings stayed with the company

Their finance office put it plainly: plan ownership and costs moved into employees' hands, and the company kept the savings. That's the ownership model working exactly as designed — each side holding the piece it's best positioned to control.

National consumer-services brand · Locations nationwide
Hospitality
Bilingual
enrollment in employees' first language carried the rollout

Enrollment succeeded because it happened in employees' first language — a fully bilingual enrollment experience, site and videos included. Adoption follows understanding, in any language.

Hospitality-sector employer · Majority Spanish-speaking workforce
Nonprofit
Both
costs contained and satisfaction up — at a 400-person nonprofit

Contained costs while employee satisfaction went up — on a nonprofit budget, where every benefits dollar competes directly with the mission.

Nonprofit human-services agency · 400+ employees
Question three

How hard is the switch?

The quiet objection: “this sounds like an implementation nightmare.” It's measured in days and weeks, not quarters — at 10 employees and at 1,850.

Holding company
60 days
to fully transitioned — platform, billing, and compliance included

Facing steep reinsurer increases and claims limits. Transitioned and had the platform, billing, and compliance mastered inside 60 days — and shed the plan-owner filing burden (Form 5500, PCORI, RxDC) that exists only because you own the plan.

Multi-entity holding company · Several operating companies
Broker-led group
“Tremendously better”
the broker's words for the employee experience after switching platforms

Started on a different employee-owned platform, then moved to the one John installs. The broker's verdict on the employee experience after the switch: “tremendously better.” The model matters — and so does the machinery underneath it.

Employer group, brought in by its broker · Switched platforms mid-stream
Small business
10
employees — the smallest end of the market, on the same playbook

A broker-based setup painful enough to dread. Replaced it with clean self-serve enrollment on the same platform the 1,850-person rollouts use. If it runs this well at 10 employees, headcount isn't the barrier.

10-person small business · Main-street scale
The ownership number

Half of members end the month with money left over.

≈ 50%
of members, month after month
≈ $250 / mo
average leftover balance

Across one enrollment platform's whole membership, roughly 50% of members finish the month with a leftover balance — about $250 on average — sitting in their benefits wallet. They spend it on care insurance doesn't cover: dental work, glasses, therapy, prescriptions. That's individual ownership in one number — your money, your choices.

Outcomes reported by employee-owned-coverage platforms and engagements, anonymized by design. They're documented results for those companies — illustrative for yours. Your census, plan, and state set your numbers, and they go in writing before you pay anything.

Your move

Get your own receipt.

Ninety seconds with Virtual John shows where you'd start and roughly what it's worth. The real John then documents your exact number — in writing — before you pay anything.